Skip to content

Bringing Sexy Back to the Comp Plan

2011 July 27
by Leslie Miller and Josh Brower

Whether you call us the stewards, champions, or guardians of Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan, it’s undeniable that the Planning Commission has a very special relationship with Toward a Sustainable Seattle, that massive, sprawling document that guides our city’s growth. Yes, perhaps it is only a Commissioner that feels drawn to tend the Utilities Element like a prizewinning rose, or who commits the Housing Appendix to memory. But allow us to unabashedly confess to having spent many a stormy evening, glass of wine in hand, passionately debating the merits of Land Use Policy 59 or a proposed amendment’s effect on the Future Land Use Map. Say what you will, for a Planning Commissioner this makes for a scintillating evening.

Okay, we recognize that most people don’t get hot and sweaty in the same way we do when there’s talk about a major update to the Comp Plan. We get that it doesn’t titillate in the same way as do backyard chickens, or the prospect of mobile food pods, or (and this might be understandable) the placement of adult cabarets. But the thing is, it should.

For those of you who have never cracked the big brown binder, the Comp Plan is where the framework policies for all these decisions get made. This is where we lay out how we should focus new jobs and housing, and what our neighborhoods should look like. The Comp Plan guides how we invest city dollars in transit, pedestrian and bike connections, parks, libraries and community centers. In truth it is the genesis, the framework from where all big-picture land use, growth, transportation, and housing decisions start. The Washington State Growth Management Act requires it.

After all, the place your backyard chickens call home is also the economic center of the region, expected to welcome at least 120,000 new residents and 115,000 new jobs by 2031, with more likely as Seattle proves an increasingly attractive alternative to the suburbs. Now is a critical time for a robust public dialogue on the opportunities and challenges Seattle faces as we grow over the next 20 years.

If you care about keeping Seattle affordable, creating neighborhoods where you can walk to what you need, prioritizing where we spend city dollars, becoming a climate-friendly city, or promoting great urban design, then it’s time to bring sexy back to the Comp Plan and get in on the major update process starting now.

What difference might it make? Consider that in 1994 light rail was a distant dream for the future, composting was for hippies, and the idea of concentrating housing and jobs around frequent transit in Urban Centers and Villages–now considered a no-brainer–was practically causing riots in the streets. Change is certain, and will bring us both new opportunities and new challenges. It’s up to us to help the city think through how we address all of these important issues and help shape the future of Seattle.

Identify your priorities for Seattle by taking the survey:

Watch the video on YouTube.


Josh Brower and Leslie Miller are the Chair and Vice Chair of the Seattle Planning Commission. The Commission, comprised of 16 volunteer members appointed by the Mayor and the City Council, is the steward of the Seattle Comprehensive Plan. In this role, the Commission advises the Mayor, City Council, and City departments on issues that shape Seattle including land use, transportation, housing, and environmental policy.


7 Responses leave one →
  1. Jessie permalink
    July 27, 2011

    I think the Comp Plan is sexy!!!!! However, I don’t find backyard chickens sexy.

  2. Lee permalink
    July 27, 2011

    Maps are always sexy…especially Maps Of The Future. Keep up the good work, Planning Commission, and thanks for making us planners feel like we’ve still got it goin’ on.

  3. MikeP permalink
    July 27, 2011

    Yeah! You go, commissioners!

  4. Paul permalink
    July 27, 2011

    Comp plans are awesome documents. Not only do they forecast a vision of the future, they spell out the wonderful complexity of our existing communities. Great post. Does McGinn love the comp plan, too?

  5. JoshMahar permalink
    July 27, 2011

    I’ll confess I haven’t read the comp plan but I assume it says lots of great things about focusing growth, creating great communities, and connecting people to jobs, commercial activities, and green space.

    But the skeptic in me wonders how useful this really is. Sure it is suppose to guide policy decisions, but when it comes to the nitty gritty of actually implementing those decisions it seems fairly benign. I’ve never once–and maybe this is just because I don’t pay enough attention–heard a council member take a position they may disagree with because “Seattle’s comp plan says we need to move in this direction”. Can you cite examples where the comp plan has directly catalyzed certain decisions?

    Also, for the uninitiated, what are some of the major issues expected to come up in the review?

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. Writing Code For More Sustainable Neighborhoods | citytank
  2. Dispatch From The SPC: Density Is Good For Our Health! | citytank

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS